CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & Murlet(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) Murlet(20)
MCC 0.715 > 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.169 > 0.619 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.658 > 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.782 > 0.667
Total TP 104 > 90
Total TN 17736 > 17734
Total FP 49 < 65
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 16
Total FP INCONS 14 < 29
Total FP COMP 20 = 20
Total FN 54 < 68
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and Murlet(20)).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 17736
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 54
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.658
Positive Predictive Value 0.782
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top



Performance of Murlet(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 17734
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 68
Total Scores
MCC 0.613
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.191
Sensitivity 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.667
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 169 0 0 0 0 5
2L94_A 0.51 0.50 0.56 9 341 8 0 7 1 9
3IVN_B 0.80 0.65 1.00 15 888 0 0 0 0 8
3JYX_4 0.72 0.75 0.69 9 4743 15 3 1 11 3
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.