CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.818 > 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.149 > 0.736 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.715 > 0.656
Positive Predictive Value 0.945 > 0.830
Total TP 208 > 191
Total TN 9485 > 9475
Total FP 16 < 42
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 6
Total FP INCONS 12 < 33
Total FP COMP 4 > 3
Total FN 83 < 100
P-value 2.28439804626e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 208
Total TN 9485
Total FP 16
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 12
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 83
Total Scores
MCC 0.818
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.811 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.715
Positive Predictive Value 0.945
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 191
Total TN 9475
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.736 ± 0.213
Sensitivity 0.656
Positive Predictive Value 0.830
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 452 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 451 0 0 0 0 3
2KUU_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 432 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.