CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(seed) & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(seed) RNAsubopt
MCC 0.765 > 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.764 ± 0.134 > 0.753 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.687 < 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.859 > 0.708
Total TP 237 < 264
Total TN 23465 > 23368
Total FP 62 < 151
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 46
Total FP INCONS 24 < 63
Total FP COMP 23 < 42
Total FN 108 > 81
P-value 2.28439804626e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(seed) and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(seed) and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(seed) and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 237
Total TN 23465
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 108
Total Scores
MCC 0.765
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.764 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.687
Positive Predictive Value 0.859
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 451 1 0 0 1 2
2KUR_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 450 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 431 1 0 0 1 2
2KUV_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 422 0 0 0 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 1 0 0 1 2
2L1F_A 0.83 0.70 1.00 16 747 0 0 0 0 7
2L1F_B 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 774 0 0 0 0 7
2L94_A 0.70 0.56 0.91 10 346 2 0 1 1 8
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 10 0 10 0 18
3A3A_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 18 1482 0 0 0 0 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3JYX_4 0.70 0.83 0.59 10 4739 13 6 1 6 2
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 13 5 3 5 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.40 0.40 0.40 8 4496 20 4 8 8 12

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 264
Total TN 23368
Total FP 151
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.732
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.753 ± 0.164
Sensitivity 0.765
Positive Predictive Value 0.708
Nr of predictions 17

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.88 0.89 0.89 16 449 3 0 2 1 2
2KUR_A 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 448 2 0 2 0 2
2KUU_A 0.88 0.89 0.89 16 429 3 0 2 1 2
2KUV_A 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 420 2 0 2 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2L1F_A 0.95 0.91 1.00 21 742 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 22 769 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3JYX_4 0.34 0.58 0.21 7 4722 38 20 7 11 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.