CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.718 > 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.107 > 0.679 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.580 < 0.687
Positive Predictive Value 0.897 > 0.622
Total TP 313 < 371
Total TN 35854 > 35607
Total FP 49 < 294
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 64
Total FP INCONS 30 < 161
Total FP COMP 13 < 69
Total FN 227 > 169
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 313
Total TN 35854
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 227
Total Scores
MCC 0.718
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.683 ± 0.107
Sensitivity 0.580
Positive Predictive Value 0.897
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.54 0.30 1.00 3 171 0 0 0 0 7
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.80 0.64 1.00 7 1828 2 0 0 2 4
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A3A_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 1481 0 0 0 0 11
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.71 0.65 0.79 15 884 4 2 2 0 8
3JYX_4 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 4749 2 0 0 2 5
3LA5_A 0.73 0.64 0.84 16 935 3 1 2 0 9
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.66 1.00 33 4807 1 0 0 1 17
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 371
Total TN 35607
Total FP 294
Total FP CONTRA 64
Total FP INCONS 161
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 169
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.128
Sensitivity 0.687
Positive Predictive Value 0.622
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 1 0 0 1 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 0.79 0.78 0.82 18 741 4 0 4 0 5
2L1F_B 0.80 0.79 0.83 19 768 4 0 4 0 5
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2XKV_B 0.20 0.27 0.16 3 1816 30 4 12 14 8
2XXA_G 0.23 0.26 0.24 9 2007 30 1 28 1 26
3A3A_A 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 1471 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3JYX_4 0.36 0.58 0.23 7 4725 37 19 5 13 5
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.