CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) RDfolder
MCC 0.742 > 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.127 > 0.672 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.633 > 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.883 > 0.746
Total TP 272 > 265
Total TN 16411 > 16364
Total FP 45 < 95
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 21
Total FP INCONS 30 < 69
Total FP COMP 9 > 5
Total FN 158 < 165
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 272
Total TN 16411
Total FP 45
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 158
Total Scores
MCC 0.742
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.702 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.883
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.54 0.30 1.00 3 171 0 0 0 0 7
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 454 2 0 1 1 3
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 371 0 0 0 0 16
2L1F_A 0.68 0.61 0.78 14 745 4 0 4 0 9
2L1F_B 0.65 0.58 0.74 14 772 5 0 5 0 10
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.80 0.64 1.00 7 1828 2 0 0 2 4
3A3A_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 1481 0 0 0 0 11
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.71 0.65 0.79 15 884 4 2 2 0 8
3LA5_A 0.73 0.64 0.84 16 935 3 1 2 0 9
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 265
Total TN 16364
Total FP 95
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.671
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.616
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 21

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 452 1 0 0 1 3
2KUR_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 451 0 0 0 0 3
2KUU_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 432 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.