CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.606 > 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.222 < 0.612 ± 0.288
Sensitivity 0.464 < 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.804 > 0.642
Total TP 78 < 97
Total TN 10108 > 10054
Total FP 24 < 68
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 17
Total FP INCONS 16 < 37
Total FP COMP 5 < 14
Total FN 90 > 71
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 78
Total TN 10108
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 90
Total Scores
MCC 0.606
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.222
Sensitivity 0.464
Positive Predictive Value 0.804
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 97
Total TN 10054
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.612 ± 0.288
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.