CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAsubopt & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAsubopt Carnac(seed)
MCC 0.745 > 0.299
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.099 > 0.169 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.757 > 0.090
Positive Predictive Value 0.740 < 1.000
Total TP 536 > 64
Total TN 49358 < 50018
Total FP 298 > 1
Total FP CONTRA 57 > 0
Total FP INCONS 131 > 0
Total FP COMP 110 > 1
Total FN 172 < 644
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAsubopt and Carnac(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAsubopt - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 536
Total TN 49358
Total FP 298
Total FP CONTRA 57
Total FP INCONS 131
Total FP COMP 110
Total FN 172
Total Scores
MCC 0.745
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.744 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.757
Positive Predictive Value 0.740
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.88 0.89 0.89 16 449 3 0 2 1 2
2KUR_A 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 448 2 0 2 0 2
2KUU_A 0.88 0.89 0.89 16 429 3 0 2 1 2
2KUV_A 0.89 0.89 0.89 17 420 2 0 2 0 2
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2L1F_A 0.95 0.91 1.00 21 742 0 0 0 0 2
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 22 769 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XXA_G 0.49 0.49 0.52 17 2012 17 1 15 1 18
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.53 0.54 0.54 15 1421 14 4 9 1 13
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IZF_C 0.89 0.91 0.86 32 2603 9 0 5 4 3
3JYX_4 0.34 0.58 0.21 7 4722 38 20 7 11 5
3JYX_3 0.77 0.80 0.75 12 2362 26 0 4 22 3
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 2246 8 0 3 5 8
3O58_2 0.87 0.90 0.85 28 2721 13 0 5 8 3
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4A1C_3 0.85 0.84 0.86 31 2727 8 0 5 3 6
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 64
Total TN 50018
Total FP 1
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 0
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 644
Total Scores
MCC 0.299
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.169 ± 0.121
Sensitivity 0.090
Positive Predictive Value 1.000
Nr of predictions 30

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 467 0 0 0 0 18
2KUR_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 460 0 0 0 0 12
2KUU_A 0.62 0.39 1.00 7 440 0 0 0 0 11
2KUV_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 9 430 0 0 0 0 10
2KUW_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 9 461 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 763 0 0 0 0 23
2L1F_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 791 0 0 0 0 24
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.47 0.22 1.00 4 524 0 0 0 0 14
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1835 0 0 0 0 11
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2045 0 0 0 0 35
3A3A_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1500 0 0 0 0 30
3GX2_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1449 0 0 0 0 28
3IVN_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 903 0 0 0 0 23
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2640 0 0 0 0 35
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4756 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2378 0 0 0 0 15
3LA5_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 954 0 0 0 0 25
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2278 0 0 0 0 37
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2754 0 0 0 0 31
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.