CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Afold
MCC 0.672 > 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.696 ± 0.143 > 0.676 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.626 < 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.727 > 0.604
Total TP 293 < 303
Total TN 58361 > 58262
Total FP 193 < 315
Total FP CONTRA 52 < 62
Total FP INCONS 58 < 137
Total FP COMP 83 < 116
Total FN 175 > 165
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 293
Total TN 58361
Total FP 193
Total FP CONTRA 52
Total FP INCONS 58
Total FP COMP 83
Total FN 175
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.696 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.626
Positive Predictive Value 0.727
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 303
Total TN 58262
Total FP 315
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 116
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.622
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.149
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.604
Nr of predictions 18

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2XXA_G 0.35 0.34 0.38 12 2013 21 1 19 1 23
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3IZF_C 0.83 0.86 0.81 30 2603 11 0 7 4 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 29 0 6 23 5
3JYX_4 0.61 0.83 0.45 10 4734 35 10 2 23 2
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_2 0.80 0.81 0.81 25 2723 14 0 6 8 6
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.