CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.586 > 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.190 > 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.521 > 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.671 > 0.475
Total TP 98 > 84
Total TN 13094 > 13063
Total FP 58 < 111
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 18
Total FP INCONS 29 < 75
Total FP COMP 10 < 18
Total FN 90 < 104
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 98
Total TN 13094
Total FP 58
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 90
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.190
Sensitivity 0.521
Positive Predictive Value 0.671
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 84
Total TN 13063
Total FP 111
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 104
Total Scores
MCC 0.453
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.465 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.447
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4A1C_3 0.32 0.30 0.35 11 2732 21 1 19 1 26
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.