CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RSpredict(20) & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RSpredict(20) Vsfold4
MCC 0.663 > 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.116 > 0.588 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.593 > 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 > 0.551
Total TP 419 > 375
Total TN 74843 > 74723
Total FP 230 < 389
Total FP CONTRA 61 < 77
Total FP INCONS 80 < 228
Total FP COMP 89 > 84
Total FN 288 < 332
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RSpredict(20) and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 419
Total TN 74843
Total FP 230
Total FP CONTRA 61
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 89
Total FN 288
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.653 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 166 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.60 9 342 7 0 6 1 9
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 12 0 0 12 0
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1831 4 1 3 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2XXA_G 0.50 0.26 1.00 9 2036 0 0 0 0 26
3A2K_C 0.88 0.86 0.90 19 1087 2 0 2 0 3
3AMU_B 0.69 0.53 0.91 10 1146 2 0 1 1 9
3GX2_A 0.40 0.21 0.75 6 1441 2 1 1 0 22
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 1 0 0 3
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.57 0.67 54 25455 38 13 14 11 41
3IZF_C 0.94 0.91 0.97 32 2607 4 0 1 3 3
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3JYX_3 0.80 0.80 0.80 12 2363 16 0 3 13 3
3JYX_4 0.59 0.75 0.47 9 4737 33 9 1 23 3
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NPB_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2272 6 1 5 0 37
3O58_2 0.93 0.94 0.94 29 2723 10 0 2 8 2
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.30 11 4727 29 15 11 3 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.70 0.92 35 4802 5 1 2 2 15
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 1 0 0 3
3SD1_A 0.82 0.86 0.78 25 1501 7 5 2 0 4
4A1C_2 0.25 0.30 0.21 6 4487 30 12 11 7 14
4A1C_3 0.60 0.49 0.75 18 2739 8 0 6 2 19
4AOB_A 0.33 0.21 0.55 6 1426 5 1 4 0 23
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.51 0.40 0.67 6 487 3 0 3 0 9

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 375
Total TN 74723
Total FP 389
Total FP CONTRA 77
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 84
Total FN 332
Total Scores
MCC 0.537
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.551
Nr of predictions 27

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 341 1 0 0 1 2
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 13 0 0 13 1
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1808 27 13 14 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1110 1 0 0 1 2
2XXA_G -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 2016 29 1 28 0 35
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 0 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3IZF_C 0.85 0.83 0.88 29 2607 6 0 4 2 6
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3JYX_3 0.64 0.67 0.63 10 2362 16 5 1 10 5
3JYX_4 0.19 0.25 0.15 3 4736 33 9 8 16 9
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_2 0.53 0.52 0.55 16 2725 16 3 10 3 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.