CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold RDfolder
MCC 0.824 > 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.818 ± 0.060 > 0.691 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.803 > 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.853 > 0.739
Total TP 1053 > 843
Total TN 50048 < 50142
Total FP 289 < 362
Total FP CONTRA 43 < 72
Total FP INCONS 138 < 225
Total FP COMP 108 > 65
Total FN 258 < 468
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1053
Total TN 50048
Total FP 289
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 138
Total FP COMP 108
Total FN 258
Total Scores
MCC 0.824
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.818 ± 0.060
Sensitivity 0.803
Positive Predictive Value 0.853
Nr of predictions 92

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 175 0 0 0 0 0
2K63_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 159 0 0 0 0 0
2K66_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 80 0 0 0 0 0
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 99 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 449 2 0 1 1 1
2KEZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 94 0 0 0 0 0
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 112 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 157 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 281 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 18 448 1 0 1 0 1
2KUU_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 429 2 0 1 1 1
2KUV_A 0.94 0.95 0.95 18 420 1 0 1 0 1
2KUW_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 452 2 0 1 1 1
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 141 0 0 0 0 0
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 151 0 0 0 0 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 65 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 68 0 0 0 0 0
2WRQ_Y 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 1144 14 0 0 14 1
2WW9_D - 0.31 0.10 1.00 1 740 3 0 0 3 9
2WW9_F - 0.64 0.75 0.60 6 102 4 1 3 0 2
2WW9_E - 0.89 0.80 1.00 4 168 0 0 0 0 1
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 2 0 0 2 0
2XKV_B 0.64 0.73 0.57 8 1821 25 0 6 19 3
2XQD_Y 0.85 0.81 0.89 17 1110 3 0 2 1 4
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.79 0.83 0.75 15 886 8 0 5 3 3
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.75 0.57 1.00 4 540 0 0 0 0 3
2ZY6_A - 0.66 0.78 0.58 7 264 5 3 2 0 2
2ZZM_B 0.07 0.07 0.10 1 1348 17 3 6 8 14
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 3 2 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.67 0.64 0.72 21 1790 9 0 8 1 12
3AKZ_H 0.49 0.50 0.50 10 1107 12 3 7 2 10
3AM1_B - 0.75 0.76 0.76 22 1437 7 3 4 0 7
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3DW4_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 136 6 1 3 2 6
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1426 2 1 0 1 6
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 910 7 0 0 7 0
3HJW_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 593 2 0 0 2 0
3IAB_R - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 373 0 0 0 0 0
3ID5_D - 0.66 0.60 0.75 3 225 1 0 1 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.69 0.68 0.70 19 1445 9 1 7 1 9
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_1 - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 473 5 0 1 4 3
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 516 3 1 2 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 5 1 2 2 2
3J16_L 0.34 0.33 0.37 7 1140 12 0 12 0 14
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1095 16 2 14 0 20
3KTW_C - 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 1756 8 0 0 8 1
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.75 0.74 0.78 14 717 4 0 4 0 5
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 4 0 0 4 0
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 2 0 0 2 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 843
Total TN 50142
Total FP 362
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 225
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 468
Total Scores
MCC 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 92

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 179 0 0 0 0 4
2K63_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 160 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 81 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 100 0 0 0 0 1
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 452 1 0 0 1 3
2KEZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 94 0 0 0 0 0
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 112 0 0 0 0 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 157 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 285 7 2 5 0 12
2KUR_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 451 0 0 0 0 3
2KUU_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 432 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 4 0 0 4 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2RPT_A - -0.07 0.00 0.00 0 68 4 1 3 0 7
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2WW9_D - 0.31 0.10 1.00 1 740 3 0 0 3 9
2WW9_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 106 1 0 0 1 2
2WW9_E - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 168 5 0 4 1 5
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.74 0.88 14 1188 4 0 2 2 5
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2ZY6_A - 0.66 0.78 0.58 7 264 5 3 2 0 2
2ZZM_B 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 1334 21 7 14 0 12
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3AKZ_H 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1106 12 1 9 2 9
3AM1_B - 0.52 0.52 0.54 15 1438 13 4 9 0 14
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3DW4_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 136 4 1 3 0 6
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 910 7 0 0 7 0
3HJW_D - 0.90 0.88 0.93 14 594 3 0 1 2 2
3IAB_R - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 373 4 0 0 4 0
3ID5_D - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 223 6 3 3 0 5
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1462 10 1 9 0 28
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3KTW_C - 0.11 0.12 0.13 3 1757 23 3 17 3 22
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 302 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 887 4 2 1 1 6
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.