CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.693 > 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.193 > 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.654 > 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.744 > 0.688
Total TP 134 > 128
Total TN 12788 > 12782
Total FP 62 < 74
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 17
Total FP INCONS 32 < 41
Total FP COMP 16 = 16
Total FN 71 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Sfold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Sfold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Sfold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 12788
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 32
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.693
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.744
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 0 5 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.78 0.72 0.84 21 1508 4 2 2 0 8
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 34 8 14 12 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12782
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.