CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & CentroidFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) CentroidFold
MCC 0.733 > 0.708
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.163 > 0.731 ± 0.180
Sensitivity 0.694 > 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.781 > 0.736
Total TP 143 > 142
Total TN 13414 > 13404
Total FP 56 < 68
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 16
Total FP INCONS 29 < 35
Total FP COMP 16 < 17
Total FN 63 < 64
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and CentroidFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 143
Total TN 13414
Total FP 56
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.733
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.735 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.694
Positive Predictive Value 0.781
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of CentroidFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 13404
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 64
Total Scores
MCC 0.708
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.731 ± 0.180
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.736
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 8 0 6 2 8
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.