CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) IPknot
MCC 0.712 > 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.710 ± 0.177 > 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.670 > 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.764 > 0.724
Total TP 126 > 123
Total TN 13075 > 13070
Total FP 54 < 61
Total FP CONTRA 11 = 11
Total FP INCONS 28 < 36
Total FP COMP 15 > 14
Total FN 62 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and IPknot).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 13075
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 62
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.710 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.670
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 13070
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.654
Positive Predictive Value 0.724
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4A1C_3 0.83 0.81 0.86 30 2728 7 0 5 2 7
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.