CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Carnac(20)
MCC 0.712 > 0.615
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.195 > 0.429 ± 0.320
Sensitivity 0.684 > 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.749 < 0.872
Total TP 128 > 82
Total TN 12269 < 12346
Total FP 59 > 15
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 2
Total FP INCONS 29 > 10
Total FP COMP 16 > 3
Total FN 59 < 105
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12269
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 12346
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 10
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.615
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.429 ± 0.320
Sensitivity 0.439
Positive Predictive Value 0.872
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 357 0 0 0 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4A1C_3 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2732 5 0 4 1 10
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.