CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.648 > 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.297 > 0.616 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.631 < 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.677 > 0.604
Total TP 111 < 113
Total TN 11367 > 11344
Total FP 68 < 100
Total FP CONTRA 15 > 13
Total FP INCONS 38 < 61
Total FP COMP 15 < 26
Total FN 65 > 63
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 111
Total TN 11367
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.636 ± 0.297
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.677
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 113
Total TN 11344
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 63
Total Scores
MCC 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.253
Sensitivity 0.642
Positive Predictive Value 0.604
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.86 0.86 32 2726 9 0 5 4 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.