CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MXScarna(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MXScarna(20)
MCC 0.712 > 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.195 > 0.627 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.684 > 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.749 > 0.712
Total TP 128 > 116
Total TN 12269 < 12277
Total FP 59 < 76
Total FP CONTRA 14 < 16
Total FP INCONS 29 < 31
Total FP COMP 16 < 29
Total FN 59 < 71
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MXScarna(20)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12269
Total FP 59
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.712
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.749
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 12277
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.660
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.627 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.712
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.73 0.72 0.76 13 340 5 0 4 1 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 6 2 1 7
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4A1C_3 0.80 0.78 0.83 29 2728 12 0 6 6 8
4AOB_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1408 13 2 7 4 9
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.