CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) McQFold
MCC 0.650 > 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.256 < 0.701 ± 0.241
Sensitivity 0.624 < 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.688 > 0.630
Total TP 128 < 133
Total TN 12782 > 12757
Total FP 74 < 88
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 21
Total FP INCONS 41 < 57
Total FP COMP 16 > 10
Total FN 77 > 72
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and McQFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 12782
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 41
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.624
Positive Predictive Value 0.688
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4A1C_3 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2728 6 0 4 2 6
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 133
Total TN 12757
Total FP 88
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.701 ± 0.241
Sensitivity 0.649
Positive Predictive Value 0.630
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4A1C_3 0.28 0.30 0.28 11 2724 30 4 24 2 26
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.