CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.603 > 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.612 ± 0.288 > 0.533 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.577 > 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.642 < 0.778
Total TP 97 > 63
Total TN 10054 < 10124
Total FP 68 > 20
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 1
Total FP INCONS 37 > 17
Total FP COMP 14 > 2
Total FN 71 < 105
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and Murlet(seed)).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 97
Total TN 10054
Total FP 68
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.603
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.612 ± 0.288
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.642
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 339 2 0 1 1 1
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 63
Total TN 10124
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 17
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.535
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.533 ± 0.192
Sensitivity 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.39 0.88 7 349 2 0 1 1 11
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.62 0.50 0.80 12 851 3 1 2 0 12
3SD1_A 0.56 0.38 0.85 11 1520 2 0 2 0 18
4A1C_2 0.59 0.35 1.00 7 4509 0 0 0 0 13
4AOB_A 0.69 0.48 1.00 14 1423 1 0 0 1 15
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.