CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for UNAFold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric UNAFold RDfolder
MCC 0.827 > 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.828 ± 0.056 > 0.691 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.822 > 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.841 > 0.739
Total TP 1078 > 843
Total TN 50000 < 50142
Total FP 319 < 362
Total FP CONTRA 59 < 72
Total FP INCONS 145 < 225
Total FP COMP 115 > 65
Total FN 233 < 468
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of UNAFold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for UNAFold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for UNAFold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of UNAFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1078
Total TN 50000
Total FP 319
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 145
Total FP COMP 115
Total FN 233
Total Scores
MCC 0.827
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.828 ± 0.056
Sensitivity 0.822
Positive Predictive Value 0.841
Nr of predictions 92

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 176 0 0 0 0 1
2K63_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 159 0 0 0 0 0
2K66_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 80 0 0 0 0 0
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 99 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 449 1 0 0 1 0
2KEZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 94 0 0 0 0 0
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 112 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 157 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 281 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 448 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 429 1 0 0 1 0
2KUV_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 420 0 0 0 0 0
2KUW_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 452 1 0 0 1 0
2KX8_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 355 0 0 0 0 0
2KXM_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 142 0 0 0 0 1
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 1 0 0 1 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 23 740 0 0 0 0 0
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 3 0 1 2 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 1 0 0 1 0
2LDT_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 152 0 0 0 0 1
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 65 0 0 0 0 0
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 14 0 0 14 0
2WW9_D - 0.13 0.10 0.20 1 736 9 1 3 5 9
2WW9_F - 0.68 0.75 0.67 6 103 4 1 2 1 2
2WW9_E - 0.89 0.80 1.00 4 168 0 0 0 0 1
2WWQ_V 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1185 3 0 0 3 0
2XKV_B 0.58 0.64 0.54 7 1822 23 0 6 17 4
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.75 0.78 0.74 14 887 8 0 5 3 4
2YIE_Z - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 587 15 6 9 0 8
2YIE_X - 0.53 0.57 0.50 4 536 6 1 3 2 3
2ZY6_A - 0.66 0.78 0.58 7 264 5 3 2 0 2
2ZZM_B 0.25 0.27 0.25 4 1342 20 3 9 8 11
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.50 0.48 10 1106 13 4 7 2 10
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1436 8 3 5 0 7
3AMU_B 0.81 0.79 0.83 15 1139 6 0 3 3 4
3DW4_A - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 135 2 0 0 2 1
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1423 5 2 2 1 6
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 910 7 0 0 7 0
3HJW_D - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 594 2 0 0 2 1
3IAB_R - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 373 0 0 0 0 0
3ID5_D - 0.59 0.60 0.60 3 224 5 0 2 3 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.80 0.79 0.81 22 1445 6 1 4 1 6
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 69 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3J0L_1 - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 473 4 0 2 2 4
3J0L_7 - 0.66 0.70 0.64 7 508 5 2 2 1 3
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 174 4 0 2 2 2
3J16_L 0.31 0.33 0.30 7 1136 16 3 13 0 14
3JYV_7 0.24 0.25 0.25 5 1091 16 7 8 1 15
3KTW_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 25 1755 7 0 0 7 0
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NMU_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 213 5 0 0 5 0
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 301 0 0 0 0 0
3R4F_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 22 884 1 0 0 1 0
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3SIU_F - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 137 0 0 0 0 0
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 1 0 0 1 0
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 112 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 843
Total TN 50142
Total FP 362
Total FP CONTRA 72
Total FP INCONS 225
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 468
Total Scores
MCC 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.076
Sensitivity 0.643
Positive Predictive Value 0.739
Nr of predictions 92

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 179 0 0 0 0 4
2K63_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 160 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 81 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 100 0 0 0 0 1
2KDQ_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 164 0 0 0 0 0
2KE6_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 452 1 0 0 1 3
2KEZ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 94 0 0 0 0 0
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 112 0 0 0 0 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 157 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 201 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 285 7 2 5 0 12
2KUR_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 451 0 0 0 0 3
2KUU_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 432 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 16 423 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 454 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 357 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.63 1.00 5 144 0 0 0 0 3
2KZL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 507 4 0 0 4 0
2L1F_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 24 767 0 0 0 0 0
2L1F_A -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 750 13 2 11 0 23
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 332 0 0 0 0 0
2L3C_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 225 0 0 0 0 0
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 228 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 30 955 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 102 0 0 0 0 0
2L94_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 339 1 0 0 1 0
2LA5_A - 0.77 0.71 0.83 5 269 1 0 1 0 2
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 193 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2LDL_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 131 0 0 0 0 0
2LDT_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 155 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 91 0 0 0 0 0
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2RPT_A - -0.07 0.00 0.00 0 68 4 1 3 0 7
2RRC_A - 0.83 0.71 1.00 5 70 0 0 0 0 2
2WRQ_Y 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 1143 13 0 0 13 0
2WW9_D - 0.31 0.10 1.00 1 740 3 0 0 3 9
2WW9_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 106 1 0 0 1 2
2WW9_E - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 168 5 0 4 1 5
2WWQ_V 0.80 0.74 0.88 14 1188 4 0 2 2 5
2XKV_B -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1813 22 10 12 0 11
2XQD_Y 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1109 1 0 0 1 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 82 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.68 0.67 0.71 12 889 7 0 5 2 6
2YIE_Z - 0.53 0.63 0.45 5 591 6 4 2 0 3
2YIE_X - 0.57 0.57 0.57 4 537 5 0 3 2 3
2ZY6_A - 0.66 0.78 0.58 7 264 5 3 2 0 2
2ZZM_B 0.15 0.20 0.13 3 1334 21 7 14 0 12
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3AKZ_H 0.53 0.55 0.52 11 1106 12 1 9 2 9
3AM1_B - 0.52 0.52 0.54 15 1438 13 4 9 0 14
3AMU_B 0.20 0.21 0.22 4 1139 16 4 10 2 15
3DW4_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 136 4 1 3 0 6
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 910 7 0 0 7 0
3HJW_D - 0.90 0.88 0.93 14 594 3 0 1 2 2
3IAB_R - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 373 4 0 0 4 0
3ID5_D - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 223 6 3 3 0 5
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1462 10 1 9 0 28
3J0L_8 - 0.92 0.86 1.00 6 70 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.62 0.89 8 475 3 0 1 2 5
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 514 5 1 4 0 10
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 173 3 2 1 0 2
3J16_L 0.26 0.24 0.31 5 1143 11 0 11 0 16
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3KTW_C - 0.11 0.12 0.13 3 1757 23 3 17 3 22
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3NMU_E - 0.57 0.33 1.00 1 215 3 0 0 3 2
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 215 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 204 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 302 0 0 0 0 1
3R4F_A - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 887 4 2 1 1 6
3R9X_C - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 221 2 0 0 2 0
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 139 0 0 0 0 2
3SN2_B 0.95 0.92 1.00 11 143 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 87 0 0 0 0 0
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 113 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 103 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 96 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.