CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold4 & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold4 PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.529 > 0.122
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.216 > 0.053 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.514 > 0.029
Positive Predictive Value 0.558 > 0.538
Total TP 125 > 7
Total TN 15996 < 16207
Total FP 120 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 0
Total FP INCONS 80 > 6
Total FP COMP 21 > 19
Total FN 118 < 236
P-value 1.3551590886e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold4 and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold4 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 15996
Total FP 120
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 118
Total Scores
MCC 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.569 ± 0.216
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.558
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3AMU_B 0.73 0.74 0.74 14 1138 8 0 5 3 5
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3UZL_B 0.66 0.69 0.65 11 1276 10 3 3 4 5
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 16207
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 236
Total Scores
MCC 0.122
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.053 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.029
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.