CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Vsfold5 & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Vsfold5 PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.484 > 0.122
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.265 > 0.053 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.498 > 0.029
Positive Predictive Value 0.486 < 0.538
Total TP 121 > 7
Total TN 15971 < 16207
Total FP 149 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 32 > 0
Total FP INCONS 96 > 6
Total FP COMP 21 > 19
Total FN 122 < 236
P-value 1.50834591464e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Vsfold5 and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Vsfold5 - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 121
Total TN 15971
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 96
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.525 ± 0.265
Sensitivity 0.498
Positive Predictive Value 0.486
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
3AMU_B 0.77 0.79 0.75 15 1137 8 0 5 3 4
3J16_L 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1139 0 0 0 0 1
3RKF_A 0.90 0.92 0.88 22 841 3 3 0 0 2
3SD1_A 0.13 0.14 0.15 4 1507 22 5 17 0 25
3UZL_B 0.24 0.31 0.20 5 1268 20 9 11 0 11
4A1C_3 0.29 0.30 0.31 11 2727 26 4 21 1 26
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.28 8 4487 37 8 13 16 12
4AOB_A 0.21 0.21 0.25 6 1413 19 2 16 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 16207
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 236
Total Scores
MCC 0.122
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.053 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.029
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.33 0.75 6 520 2 0 2 0 12
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1157 0 0 0 0 19
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1159 0 0 0 0 21
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 866 0 0 0 0 24
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1533 0 0 0 0 29
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1293 0 0 0 0 16
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2763 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_2 0.10 0.05 0.20 1 4511 23 0 4 19 19
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1437 0 0 0 0 29
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.