 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||
Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Afold & Carnac(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric | Afold | Carnac(seed) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC | 0.678 | > | 0.311 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.728 ± 0.107 | > | 0.209 ± 0.147 |
| Sensitivity | 0.624 | > | 0.097 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.742 | < | 1.000 |
| Total TP | 416 | > | 65 |
| Total TN | 93305 | < | 93801 |
| Total FP | 201 | > | 0 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 20 | > | 0 |
| Total FP INCONS | 125 | > | 0 |
| Total FP COMP | 56 | > | 0 |
| Total FN | 251 | < | 602 |
| P-value | 5.23657817852e-08 | ||
Performance plots
Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Afold
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 416 |
| Total TN | 93305 |
| Total FP | 201 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 20 |
| Total FP INCONS | 125 |
| Total FP COMP | 56 |
| Total FN | 251 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.678 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.728 ± 0.107 |
| Sensitivity | 0.624 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.742 |
| Nr of predictions | 23 |
2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2KDQ_B | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 10 | 396 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2KE6_A | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 18 | 1110 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2KUR_A | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 19 | 1109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2KUU_A | 0.92 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 18 | 1110 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2KUV_A | 0.93 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 19 | 1109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2KUW_A | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 19 | 1109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2L1F_A | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 23 | 2056 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2L1F_B | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 24 | 2120 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2L94_A | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 19 | 971 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2LC8_A | 0.61 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 11 | 1524 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 9 | |
| 2XXA_G | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 13 | 5118 | 20 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 29 | |
| 3A3A_A | 0.84 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 26 | 3629 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 3IVN_B | 0.78 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 19 | 2327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 3IZF_C | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 31 | 6862 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 23 | |
| 3JYX_4 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 10 | 12214 | 35 | 5 | 17 | 13 | 23 | |
| 3JYX_3 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 15 | 6300 | 24 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 12 | |
| 3LA5_A | 0.78 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 21 | 2464 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| 3NPB_A | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.90 | 28 | 6990 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | |
| 3O58_3 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 12 | 12368 | 37 | 2 | 21 | 14 | 23 | |
| 3O58_2 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 25 | 7222 | 14 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 13 | |
| 3RKF_A | 0.76 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 20 | 2191 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 4A1C_2 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 5 | 11745 | 43 | 5 | 26 | 12 | 28 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 11 | 1261 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
Performance of Carnac(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 65 |
| Total TN | 93801 |
| Total FP | 0 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 0 |
| Total FP INCONS | 0 |
| Total FP COMP | 0 |
| Total FN | 602 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.311 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.209 ± 0.147 |
| Sensitivity | 0.097 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 1.000 |
| Nr of predictions | 23 |
2. Individual counts for Carnac(seed) [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2KDQ_B | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 10 | 396 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2KE6_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1128 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | |
| 2KUR_A | 0.57 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 7 | 1121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 2KUU_A | 0.57 | 0.33 | 1.00 | 7 | 1121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 2KUV_A | 0.64 | 0.41 | 1.00 | 9 | 1119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| 2KUW_A | 0.65 | 0.43 | 1.00 | 9 | 1119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 2L1F_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | |
| 2L1F_B | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | |
| 2L94_A | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 19 | 971 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2LC8_A | 0.44 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 4 | 1536 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | |
| 2XXA_G | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 5151 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | |
| 3A3A_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 3655 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 | |
| 3IVN_B | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2346 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | |
| 3IZF_C | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 6903 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | |
| 3JYX_4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 12246 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | |
| 3JYX_3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 6328 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | |
| 3LA5_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2485 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | |
| 3NPB_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 7021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | |
| 3O58_3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 12403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | |
| 3O58_2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 7260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | |
| 3RKF_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2211 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 | |
| 4A1C_2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 11781 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1275 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.