CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold MCFold
MCC 0.688 > 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.715 ± 0.066 > 0.691 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.631 < 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 > 0.606
Total TP 1119 < 1127
Total TN 174837 > 174454
Total FP 449 < 884
Total FP CONTRA 41 < 111
Total FP INCONS 318 < 623
Total FP COMP 90 < 150
Total FN 654 > 646
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1119
Total TN 174837
Total FP 449
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 318
Total FP COMP 90
Total FN 654
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.715 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 86

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 0
2K63_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 397 0 0 0 0 1
2K66_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 1
2KEZ_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 622 8 0 8 0 20
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 12 691 0 0 0 0 4
2KUR_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KUU_A 0.92 0.86 1.00 18 1110 1 0 0 1 3
2KUV_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 3
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 343 0 0 0 0 2
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 4
2RP0_A - 0.58 0.42 0.83 5 345 1 0 1 0 7
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 0
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - 0.47 0.29 0.80 4 556 1 0 1 0 10
2WW9_D - 0.18 0.15 0.24 4 1936 13 0 13 0 22
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
2ZY6_A - 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 690 6 1 5 0 5
2ZZN_D 0.80 0.74 0.87 20 2462 3 0 3 0 7
3A2K_C 0.41 0.39 0.44 11 2901 14 2 12 0 17
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3DW4_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 344 7 0 7 0 10
3GCA_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 519 9 0 9 0 17
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 7 0 0 7 3
3HJW_D - 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 1636 3 0 1 2 2
3IAB_R - 0.92 0.86 1.00 12 1023 0 0 0 0 2
3ID5_D - 0.40 0.33 0.50 3 490 6 0 3 3 6
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.62 0.58 0.68 19 4250 9 0 9 0 14
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.73 0.60 0.90 26 6076 5 0 3 2 17
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2827 23 1 22 0 32
3JYX_4 0.31 0.30 0.31 10 12214 35 5 17 13 23
3JYX_3 0.54 0.56 0.54 15 6300 24 1 12 11 12
3KTW_C - 0.71 0.63 0.82 27 4527 7 2 4 1 16
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 1 7 2 6
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3OVS_D - 0.80 0.77 0.83 10 549 2 0 2 0 3
3P22_G - 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 730 1 0 1 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 1 0 0 1 1
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1127
Total TN 174454
Total FP 884
Total FP CONTRA 111
Total FP INCONS 623
Total FP COMP 150
Total FN 646
Total Scores
MCC 0.617
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.071
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.606
Nr of predictions 86

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 395 1 0 0 1 0
2K63_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 396 4 0 1 3 1
2K66_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 221 0 0 0 0 0
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 1 0 0 1 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 1 0 0 1 1
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1109 2 0 0 2 0
2KEZ_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 266 1 0 1 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.28 0.25 0.36 5 616 9 2 7 0 15
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 1 0 0 1 0
2KPV_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 548 2 0 0 2 0
2KU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 688 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1108 1 0 0 1 1
2KUV_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
2KUW_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1107 1 0 1 0 1
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 341 1 0 0 1 0
2KZL_A - 0.80 0.84 0.76 16 1464 9 1 4 4 3
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 842 1 0 0 1 0
2L3C_B - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 545 0 0 0 0 1
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 582 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 34 2451 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 314 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2RP0_A - 0.44 0.42 0.50 5 341 5 1 4 0 7
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 183 2 0 0 2 0
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 547 14 0 14 0 14
2WW9_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1925 28 5 23 0 26
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
2ZY6_A - 0.51 0.58 0.47 7 688 8 3 5 0 5
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AM1_B - 0.93 0.89 0.97 31 3208 2 0 1 1 4
3DW4_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 341 3 0 1 2 1
3GCA_A - 0.04 0.06 0.07 1 514 13 1 12 0 16
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 2260 11 0 0 11 0
3HJW_D - 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 1635 8 0 1 7 1
3IAB_R - 0.84 0.93 0.76 13 1018 8 2 2 4 1
3ID5_D - 0.34 0.33 0.38 3 488 9 0 5 4 6
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IWN_A 0.19 0.21 0.18 7 4238 33 8 25 0 26
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3KTW_C - 0.40 0.40 0.43 17 4520 24 4 19 1 26
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3NDB_M - 0.23 0.23 0.24 14 9121 46 1 44 1 47
3NKB_B - 0.56 0.58 0.56 15 1989 13 0 12 1 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 2 553 12 0 6 6 4
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 729 5 0 0 5 0
3R4F_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 23 2120 5 0 2 3 2
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.