Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Afold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Afold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Afold |
|
NanoFolder |
| MCC |
0.683 |
>
|
0.548 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.781
±
0.172
|
>
|
0.737
±
0.204
|
| Sensitivity |
0.643 |
>
|
0.576 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.731 |
>
|
0.529 |
| Total TP |
144 |
>
|
129 |
| Total TN |
25626 |
>
|
25579 |
| Total FP |
71 |
<
|
125 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
6 |
<
|
22 |
| Total FP INCONS |
47 |
<
|
93 |
| Total FP COMP |
18 |
>
|
10 |
| Total FN |
80 |
<
|
95 |
| P-value |
2.22210847902e-08 |
Performance of Afold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Afold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
144 |
| Total TN |
25626 |
| Total FP |
71 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
6 |
| Total FP INCONS |
47 |
| Total FP COMP |
18 |
| Total FN |
80 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.683 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.781
±
0.172
|
| Sensitivity |
0.643 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.731 |
| Nr of predictions |
12 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
129 |
| Total TN |
25579 |
| Total FP |
125 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
22 |
| Total FP INCONS |
93 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
95 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.548 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.737
±
0.204
|
| Sensitivity |
0.576 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.529 |
| Nr of predictions |
12 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|