Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Afold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Afold |
|
RNASLOpt |
| MCC |
0.677 |
>
|
0.646 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.748
±
0.148
|
>
|
0.733
±
0.146
|
| Sensitivity |
0.624 |
>
|
0.572 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.740 |
>
|
0.736 |
| Total TP |
216 |
>
|
198 |
| Total TN |
36378 |
<
|
36401 |
| Total FP |
99 |
>
|
83 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
8 |
<
|
9 |
| Total FP INCONS |
68 |
>
|
62 |
| Total FP COMP |
23 |
>
|
12 |
| Total FN |
130 |
<
|
148 |
| P-value |
2.50323628132e-08 |
Performance of Afold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Afold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
216 |
| Total TN |
36378 |
| Total FP |
99 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
8 |
| Total FP INCONS |
68 |
| Total FP COMP |
23 |
| Total FN |
130 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.677 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.748
±
0.148
|
| Sensitivity |
0.624 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.740 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
198 |
| Total TN |
36401 |
| Total FP |
83 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
9 |
| Total FP INCONS |
62 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
| Total FN |
148 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.646 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.733
±
0.146
|
| Sensitivity |
0.572 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.736 |
| Nr of predictions |
18 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|