CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RNAwolf
MCC 0.670 > 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.720 ± 0.134 > 0.663 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.615 > 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.738 > 0.636
Total TP 273 > 250
Total TN 42768 > 42745
Total FP 123 < 169
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 17
Total FP INCONS 84 < 126
Total FP COMP 26 = 26
Total FN 171 < 194
P-value 5.06544643719e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 273
Total TN 42768
Total FP 123
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 84
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 171
Total Scores
MCC 0.670
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.720 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.615
Positive Predictive Value 0.738
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 4
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
3J0L_h - 0.73 0.60 0.90 26 6076 5 0 3 2 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 1 0 0 1 1
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 250
Total TN 42745
Total FP 169
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 126
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 194
Total Scores
MCC 0.595
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LDT_A - 0.86 0.80 0.92 12 452 1 0 1 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 3 0 0 3 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.37 0.38 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 8
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1364 15 4 10 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 9 1 5 3 7
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.