CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & CentroidAlifold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna CentroidAlifold(seed)
MCC 0.650 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.100 > 0.538 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.583 > 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.733 < 0.854
Total TP 444 > 316
Total TN 68616 < 68852
Total FP 188 > 71
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 1
Total FP INCONS 142 > 53
Total FP COMP 26 > 17
Total FN 318 < 446
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and CentroidAlifold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 444
Total TN 68616
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 318
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.583
Positive Predictive Value 0.733
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3463 20 2 18 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 0 22 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top



Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 316
Total TN 68852
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 446
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.100
Sensitivity 0.415
Positive Predictive Value 0.854
Nr of predictions 28

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.42 0.47 8 1111 10 0 9 1 11
2KUR_A 0.77 0.71 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 6
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.44 0.41 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 13
2KUW_A 0.45 0.43 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 12
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XKV_B 0.53 0.50 0.56 10 4542 20 0 8 12 10
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
2ZZM_B 0.14 0.06 0.33 2 3480 4 0 4 0 30
2ZZN_D 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2479 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
3UZL_B 0.40 0.16 1.00 6 3564 0 0 0 0 31

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.