CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.655 > 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.099 > 0.366 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.587 > 0.264
Positive Predictive Value 0.737 > 0.729
Total TP 454 > 204
Total TN 69012 < 69348
Total FP 188 > 81
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 4
Total FP INCONS 142 > 72
Total FP COMP 26 > 5
Total FN 319 < 569
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 454
Total TN 69012
Total FP 188
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 26
Total FN 319
Total Scores
MCC 0.655
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.681 ± 0.099
Sensitivity 0.587
Positive Predictive Value 0.737
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 19 1109 0 0 0 0 2
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 13 5 3 5 7
2WWQ_V 0.76 0.68 0.86 19 2904 5 0 3 2 9
2XKV_B 0.45 0.45 0.45 9 4540 25 0 11 14 11
2XQD_Y 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2829 5 0 5 0 11
2ZZM_B 0.10 0.09 0.13 3 3463 20 2 18 0 29
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.44 0.43 0.46 12 2900 14 2 12 0 16
3A3A_A 0.84 0.70 1.00 26 3629 0 0 0 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.39 0.42 11 2675 15 4 11 0 17
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3GX2_A 0.47 0.40 0.57 16 4343 13 1 11 1 24
3IVN_B 0.74 0.61 0.90 19 2325 2 1 1 0 12
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2828 22 0 22 0 32
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 69348
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 4
Total FP INCONS 72
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 569
Total Scores
MCC 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.366 ± 0.139
Sensitivity 0.264
Positive Predictive Value 0.729
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2KE6_A 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 5
2KUR_A 0.82 0.71 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 6
2KUU_A 0.79 0.67 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 7
2KUV_A 0.80 0.68 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 7
2KUW_A 0.73 0.62 0.87 13 1113 2 0 2 0 8
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 860 1 0 1 0 18
2L1F_B 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 2123 2 0 2 0 5
2L1F_A 0.80 0.75 0.86 18 2059 3 0 3 0 6
2L94_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 10 975 5 0 5 0 10
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2920 6 1 5 0 28
2XKV_B 0.28 0.20 0.40 4 4550 8 2 4 2 16
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
2ZZM_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3482 4 0 4 0 32
2ZZN_D 0.43 0.19 1.00 5 2480 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3A3A_A 0.48 0.30 0.79 11 3641 3 0 3 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2699 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.