 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||
Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric | CRWrnafold | RDfolder | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC | 0.613 | > | 0.465 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.649 ± 0.156 | > | 0.543 ± 0.163 |
| Sensitivity | 0.544 | > | 0.365 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.701 | > | 0.606 |
| Total TP | 204 | > | 137 |
| Total TN | 28030 | < | 28095 |
| Total FP | 96 | > | 93 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 15 | > | 11 |
| Total FP INCONS | 72 | < | 78 |
| Total FP COMP | 9 | > | 4 |
| Total FN | 171 | < | 238 |
| P-value | 5.19332990918e-08 | ||
Performance plots
Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 204 |
| Total TN | 28030 |
| Total FP | 96 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 15 |
| Total FP INCONS | 72 |
| Total FP COMP | 9 |
| Total FN | 171 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.613 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.649 ± 0.156 |
| Sensitivity | 0.544 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.701 |
| Nr of predictions | 23 |
2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2LBS_A | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 14 | 482 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2LC8_A | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1525 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 20 | |
| 2LDL_A | - | 0.85 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 8 | 343 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 2LDT_A | - | 0.85 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 11 | 454 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2LK3_A | - | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 9 | 267 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2YIE_X | - | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 4 | 1368 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 8 |
| 2YIE_Z | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1525 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 3AMU_B | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.76 | 16 | 2982 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 | |
| 3J0L_7 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1212 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 17 |
| 3J0L_8 | - | 0.93 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 7 | 183 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3J0L_a | - | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.50 | 5 | 1118 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| 3J0L_1 | - | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.92 | 12 | 1212 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 3J0L_g | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 461 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 3J16_L | 0.84 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 21 | 2754 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| 3SD1_A | 0.52 | 0.45 | 0.61 | 19 | 3885 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 23 | |
| 3SN2_B | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 11 | 395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3TRZ_Z | - | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 5 | 205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3TS0_U | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 6 | 247 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3TS2_V | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 271 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4A4U_A | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4AOB_A | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 20 | 4344 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 22 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 11 | 1262 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| 4ENC_A | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.85 | 11 | 1313 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 137 |
| Total TN | 28095 |
| Total FP | 93 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 11 |
| Total FP INCONS | 78 |
| Total FP COMP | 4 |
| Total FN | 238 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.465 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.543 ± 0.163 |
| Sensitivity | 0.365 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.606 |
| Nr of predictions | 23 |
2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2LBS_A | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 14 | 482 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2LC8_A | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1526 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 20 | |
| 2LDL_A | - | 0.90 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 9 | 342 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2LDT_A | - | 0.68 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 7 | 458 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2LK3_A | - | 0.95 | 0.90 | 1.00 | 9 | 267 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2YIE_X | - | 0.38 | 0.33 | 0.44 | 4 | 1369 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 2YIE_Z | - | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 5 | 1529 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| 3AMU_B | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 4 | 2985 | 16 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 23 | |
| 3J0L_7 | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1220 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| 3J0L_8 | - | 0.86 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 6 | 184 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 3J0L_a | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 1124 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 16 |
| 3J0L_1 | - | 0.65 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 9 | 1215 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 3J0L_g | - | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 462 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 3J16_L | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 5 | 2759 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 25 | |
| 3SD1_A | 0.30 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 7 | 3903 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 35 | |
| 3SN2_B | 0.96 | 0.92 | 1.00 | 11 | 395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3TRZ_Z | - | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 5 | 205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3TS0_U | - | 0.91 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 5 | 248 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 3TS2_V | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 271 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4A4U_A | - | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 9 | 222 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4AOB_A | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 11 | 4348 | 13 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 31 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.60 | 6 | 1265 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 13 | |
| 4ENC_A | 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.60 | 6 | 1316 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.