CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold RNAwolf
MCC 0.585 > 0.475
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.123 > 0.555 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.522 > 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.663 > 0.513
Total TP 343 > 295
Total TN 69824 > 69766
Total FP 196 < 311
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 33
Total FP INCONS 150 < 247
Total FP COMP 22 < 31
Total FN 314 < 362
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 343
Total TN 69824
Total FP 196
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 150
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 314
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.663
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 652 0 0 0 0 2
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.52 0.44 0.63 17 6078 12 2 8 2 22
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 1 4 0 11
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 23 2 19 2 25
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.81 0.65 1.00 28 6077 0 0 0 0 15
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.84 0.70 1.00 21 2754 0 0 0 0 9
3SD1_A 0.52 0.45 0.61 19 3885 12 2 10 0 23
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.13 5 11741 44 4 31 9 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 4344 8 2 5 1 22
4ENB_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1262 2 1 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1313 2 1 1 0 8

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 295
Total TN 69766
Total FP 311
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 247
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 362
Total Scores
MCC 0.475
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.449
Positive Predictive Value 0.513
Nr of predictions 32

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 4
2LDT_A - 0.86 0.80 0.92 12 452 1 0 1 0 3
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.81 0.74 0.88 29 6072 8 0 4 4 10
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2YIE_X - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1364 15 4 10 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 9 1 5 3 7
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.19 0.20 3 1113 12 1 11 0 13
3J0L_2 - 0.11 0.12 0.11 4 6181 34 5 26 3 29
3J0L_g - 0.16 0.25 0.11 1 456 8 6 2 0 3
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1214 11 0 11 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.33 0.30 0.37 13 6070 24 0 22 2 30
3J0L_1 - 0.68 0.63 0.75 12 1209 5 0 4 1 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 270 7 0 6 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.44 0.38 0.52 14 3133 13 0 13 0 23
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.