CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.650 > 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.256 > 0.568 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.473 > 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.898 > 0.763
Total TP 79 > 74
Total TN 25805 > 25796
Total FP 13 < 37
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 2
Total FP INCONS 8 < 21
Total FP COMP 4 < 14
Total FN 88 < 93
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 25805
Total FP 13
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 88
Total Scores
MCC 0.650
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.613 ± 0.256
Sensitivity 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.898
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 74
Total TN 25796
Total FP 37
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.568 ± 0.278
Sensitivity 0.443
Positive Predictive Value 0.763
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.