CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) NanoFolder
MCC 0.646 > 0.316
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.372 > 0.345 ± 0.403
Sensitivity 0.473 > 0.324
Positive Predictive Value 0.886 > 0.316
Total TP 70 > 48
Total TN 24539 > 24466
Total FP 13 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 15
Total FP INCONS 8 < 89
Total FP COMP 4 < 10
Total FN 78 < 100
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 70
Total TN 24539
Total FP 13
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.646
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.372
Sensitivity 0.473
Positive Predictive Value 0.886
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 48
Total TN 24466
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 100
Total Scores
MCC 0.316
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.345 ± 0.403
Sensitivity 0.324
Positive Predictive Value 0.316
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_3 0.48 0.46 0.51 25 7091 24 2 22 0 29
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11728 61 12 41 8 33
4AOB_A 0.33 0.29 0.39 12 4340 20 1 18 1 30
4ENC_A 0.57 0.58 0.58 11 1307 9 0 8 1 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.