CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & PPfold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) PPfold(20)
MCC 0.684 > 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.130 > 0.639 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.517 > 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.909 > 0.861
Total TP 150 > 149
Total TN 35848 > 35840
Total FP 20 < 30
Total FP CONTRA 1 > 0
Total FP INCONS 14 < 24
Total FP COMP 5 < 6
Total FN 140 < 141
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and PPfold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 150
Total TN 35848
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 14
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.684
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.517
Positive Predictive Value 0.909
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 974 5 0 5 0 9
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of PPfold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 149
Total TN 35840
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 141
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.639 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.861
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.63 0.45 0.90 9 980 1 0 1 0 11
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.73 0.56 0.95 19 2191 1 0 1 0 15
3SD1_A 0.68 0.52 0.88 22 3891 3 0 3 0 20
4A1C_2 0.21 0.15 0.29 5 11764 16 0 12 4 28
4A1C_3 0.77 0.63 0.94 34 7104 2 0 2 0 20
4AOB_A 0.74 0.60 0.93 25 4344 3 0 2 1 17
4ENB_A 0.56 0.37 0.88 7 1267 1 0 1 0 12
4ENC_A 0.58 0.42 0.80 8 1316 2 0 2 0 11

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.