CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) RNAwolf
MCC 0.691 > 0.364
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.151 > 0.385 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.515 > 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.933 > 0.407
Total TP 139 > 90
Total TN 34874 > 34802
Total FP 15 < 144
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 15
Total FP INCONS 9 < 116
Total FP COMP 5 < 13
Total FN 131 < 180
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 139
Total TN 34874
Total FP 15
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 131
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.669 ± 0.151
Sensitivity 0.515
Positive Predictive Value 0.933
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2983 1 0 0 1 7
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.26 0.15 0.45 5 11770 8 1 5 2 28
4A1C_3 0.76 0.63 0.92 34 7103 4 0 3 1 20
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.60 0.37 1.00 7 1319 0 0 0 0 12

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 90
Total TN 34802
Total FP 144
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 116
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 180
Total Scores
MCC 0.364
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.385 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.333
Positive Predictive Value 0.407
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.