CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.620 > 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.073 > 0.529 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.433 < 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.893 > 0.483
Total TP 484 < 584
Total TN 146317 > 145650
Total FP 85 < 693
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 85
Total FP INCONS 57 < 540
Total FP COMP 27 < 68
Total FN 635 > 535
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 484
Total TN 146317
Total FP 85
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 635
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.073
Sensitivity 0.433
Positive Predictive Value 0.893
Nr of predictions 37

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 0.44 0.42 0.47 8 1111 10 0 9 1 11
2KUR_A 0.77 0.71 0.83 15 1110 3 0 3 0 6
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.44 0.41 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 13
2KUW_A 0.45 0.43 0.50 9 1110 9 0 9 0 12
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 861 0 0 0 0 18
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1540 0 0 0 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.24 0.12 0.50 2 2846 4 0 2 2 15
2WWQ_V 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
2XKV_B 0.53 0.50 0.56 10 4542 20 0 8 12 10
2XQD_Y 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 21
2XXA_G 0.77 0.64 0.93 27 5122 3 0 2 1 15
2ZZN_D 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2479 0 0 0 0 21
3A2K_C 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2920 0 0 0 0 22
3A3A_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 27 3628 0 0 0 0 10
3AKZ_H 0.46 0.21 1.00 6 2695 0 0 0 0 22
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3GX2_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 16
3IVN_B 0.78 0.65 0.95 20 2325 1 1 0 0 11
3IZF_C 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 6887 0 0 0 0 38
3J16_L 0.45 0.20 1.00 6 2769 0 0 0 0 24
3JYV_7 0.43 0.19 1.00 6 2844 0 0 0 0 26
3JYX_3 0.59 0.41 0.85 11 6315 5 0 2 3 16
3JYX_4 0.52 0.30 0.91 10 12235 3 0 1 2 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3O58_2 0.65 0.42 1.00 16 7244 0 0 0 0 22
3O58_3 0.56 0.34 0.92 12 12390 1 0 1 0 23
3PDR_A 0.77 0.61 0.98 44 12835 3 0 1 2 28
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 584
Total TN 145650
Total FP 693
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 540
Total FP COMP 68
Total FN 535
Total Scores
MCC 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.529 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.483
Nr of predictions 37

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1109 2 0 0 2 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1108 1 0 0 1 1
2KUV_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
2KUW_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1107 1 0 1 0 1
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XKV_B 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4530 37 2 23 12 15
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.