CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.624 > 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.089 < 0.638 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.421 < 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.931 > 0.775
Total TP 122 < 145
Total TN 35882 > 35826
Total FP 12 < 54
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 3
Total FP INCONS 9 < 39
Total FP COMP 3 < 12
Total FN 168 > 145
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 122
Total TN 35882
Total FP 12
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 9
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.614 ± 0.089
Sensitivity 0.421
Positive Predictive Value 0.931
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.53 0.50 0.59 10 973 7 0 7 0 10
3AMU_B 0.47 0.22 1.00 6 2997 0 0 0 0 21
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.52 0.96 22 3893 1 0 1 0 20
4A1C_2 0.46 0.24 0.89 8 11772 3 0 1 2 25
4A1C_3 0.54 0.30 1.00 16 7124 0 0 0 0 38
4AOB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 24 4347 1 0 0 1 18
4ENB_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1267 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.65 0.42 1.00 8 1318 0 0 0 0 11

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 145
Total TN 35826
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.638 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.500
Positive Predictive Value 0.775
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4AOB_A 0.56 0.40 0.77 17 4349 6 1 4 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.