CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Multilign(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Multilign(20)
MCC 0.548 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.186 > 0.526 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.452 > 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.673 > 0.643
Total TP 150 > 142
Total TN 40941 < 40943
Total FP 81 < 86
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 8
Total FP INCONS 63 < 71
Total FP COMP 8 > 7
Total FN 182 < 190
P-value 1.47941000302e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Multilign(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Multilign(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Multilign(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Multilign(20)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 150
Total TN 40941
Total FP 81
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 182
Total Scores
MCC 0.548
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.186
Sensitivity 0.452
Positive Predictive Value 0.673
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2XXA_G 0.15 0.12 0.20 5 5126 20 1 19 0 37
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Multilign(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 40943
Total FP 86
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 71
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 190
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.526 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.428
Positive Predictive Value 0.643
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5139 12 1 11 0 42
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4AOB_A 0.49 0.38 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 26
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.