CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & PPfold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold PPfold(seed)
MCC 0.578 > 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.592 ± 0.123 > 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.465 > 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.725 > 0.538
Total TP 166 > 7
Total TN 42679 < 42895
Total FP 71 > 25
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 0
Total FP INCONS 53 > 6
Total FP COMP 8 < 19
Total FN 191 < 350
P-value 1.80908287419e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and PPfold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and PPfold(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and PPfold(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and PPfold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and PPfold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 166
Total TN 42679
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 191
Total Scores
MCC 0.578
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.592 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.49 0.35 0.70 7 1530 3 1 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J16_L 0.50 0.40 0.63 12 2756 7 0 7 0 18
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.58 0.48 0.71 20 3888 8 1 7 0 22
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_3 0.67 0.56 0.81 30 7103 7 1 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11752 29 5 19 5 28
4AOB_A 0.45 0.33 0.61 14 4348 10 1 8 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of PPfold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 7
Total TN 42895
Total FP 25
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 6
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 350
Total Scores
MCC 0.102
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.050 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.020
Positive Predictive Value 0.538
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.47 0.30 0.75 6 1532 2 0 2 0 14
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3003 0 0 0 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2775 0 0 0 0 30
3RKF_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2211 0 0 0 0 34
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3570 0 0 0 0 37
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7140 0 0 0 0 54
4A1C_2 0.08 0.03 0.20 1 11776 23 0 4 19 32
4AOB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4371 0 0 0 0 42
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1275 0 0 0 0 19
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 1326 0 0 0 0 19

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.