CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Alterna [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Alterna
MCC 0.696 > 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.116 > 0.638 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.533 < 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.915 > 0.690
Total TP 247 < 252
Total TN 32482 > 32387
Total FP 34 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 18
Total FP INCONS 23 < 95
Total FP COMP 11 < 16
Total FN 216 > 211
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 247
Total TN 32482
Total FP 34
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 216
Total Scores
MCC 0.696
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.691 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.915
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.20 0.04 1.00 1 2277 0 0 0 0 23
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17

^top



Performance of Alterna - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 252
Total TN 32387
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 95
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 211
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.638 ± 0.122
Sensitivity 0.544
Positive Predictive Value 0.690
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.46 0.40 0.53 8 1525 7 0 7 0 12
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 9 2 4 3 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AMU_B 0.64 0.59 0.70 16 2980 9 0 7 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.61 0.53 0.71 10 1211 6 0 4 2 9
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 456 9 4 5 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.23 0.19 0.30 3 1118 7 1 6 0 13
3J0L_7 - 0.26 0.24 0.31 4 1212 9 0 9 0 13
3J16_L 0.63 0.53 0.76 16 2754 5 1 4 0 14
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 2 6 2 6
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.69 0.56 0.86 19 2189 3 1 2 0 15
3SD1_A 0.46 0.38 0.57 16 3888 12 1 11 0 26
3SIU_F - 0.59 0.55 0.67 6 369 3 0 3 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3UZL_B 0.52 0.43 0.64 16 3545 9 2 7 0 21

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.