CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		Contrafold
MCC	0.668	>	0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.091	<	0.712 ± 0.081
Sensitivity	0.515	<	0.579
Positive Predictive Value	0.873	>	0.764
Total TP	439	<	493
Total TN	82453	>	82311
Total FP	86	<	188
Total FP CONTRA	6	<	25
Total FP INCONS	58	<	127
Total FP COMP	22	<	36
Total FN	413	>	359
P-value	9.17559933998e-05

^top

Performance plots

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	439
Total TN	82453
Total FP	86
Total FP CONTRA	6
Total FP INCONS	58
Total FP COMP	22
Total FN	413

Total Scores
MCC	0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.091
Sensitivity	0.515
Positive Predictive Value	0.873
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	0	11	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	8	457	0	0	0	0	7
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	6101	4	0	4	0	39
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.20	0.04	1.00	1	2277	0	0	0	0	23
2YIE_X	-	0.76	0.58	1.00	7	1371	0	0	0	0	5
2YIE_Z	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	8	1532	0	0	0	0	4
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_h	-	0.76	0.63	0.93	27	6076	4	0	2	2	16
3J0L_7	-	0.60	0.41	0.88	7	1217	1	0	1	0	10
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	465	0	0	0	0	4
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1125	3	0	3	0	16
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.24	1.00	8	6208	0	0	0	0	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3NMU_E	-	0.41	0.17	1.00	1	560	3	0	0	3	5
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.53	1.00	18	2193	0	0	0	0	16
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.45	0.90	19	3895	2	0	2	0	23
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.43	0.80	16	3140	4	0	4	0	21
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.18	5	11753	29	5	18	6	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	7104	6	0	6	0	24
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	21	4350	1	0	0	1	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8

^top

Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	493
Total TN	82311
Total FP	188
Total FP CONTRA	25
Total FP INCONS	127
Total FP COMP	36
Total FN	359

Total Scores
MCC	0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.712 ± 0.081
Sensitivity	0.579
Positive Predictive Value	0.764
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
2LA5_A	-	0.39	0.26	0.63	5	622	3	1	2	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.35	0.58	7	1528	5	2	3	0	13
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.84	0.79	0.89	31	6070	6	0	4	2	8
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.88	0.85	0.92	11	484	1	0	1	0	2
2RRC_A	-	0.83	0.70	1.00	7	224	0	0	0	0	3
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	3	0	0	3	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.66	0.63	0.71	15	2257	8	1	5	2	9
2YIE_X	-	0.73	0.67	0.80	8	1368	3	1	1	1	4
2YIE_Z	-	0.43	0.42	0.45	5	1529	6	3	3	0	7
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.65	0.59	0.73	16	2981	8	0	6	2	11
3J0L_1	-	0.73	0.58	0.92	11	1213	2	0	1	1	8
3J0L_h	-	0.75	0.65	0.88	28	6073	6	0	4	2	15
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1218	7	0	7	0	17
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	464	1	1	0	0	4
3J0L_a	-	0.50	0.44	0.58	7	1116	5	2	3	0	9
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_2	-	0.25	0.24	0.28	8	6187	26	0	21	5	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.46	0.40	0.55	12	2753	10	1	9	0	18
3NMU_E	-	0.71	0.50	1.00	3	558	3	0	0	3	3
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.59	0.91	20	2189	2	1	1	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.57	0.48	0.69	20	3887	9	2	7	0	22
3SIU_F	-	0.74	0.64	0.88	7	370	1	0	1	0	4
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.59	0.46	0.77	17	3138	5	0	5	0	20
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.54	0.91	20	3548	2	0	2	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.17	5	11751	33	5	20	8	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.66	0.57	0.78	31	7100	9	1	8	0	23
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.36	0.56	15	4344	13	1	11	1	27
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.58	0.92	11	1263	1	1	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.73	0.58	0.92	11	1314	1	1	0	0	8

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]