CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST Cylofold
MCC 0.663 > 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.101 > 0.615 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.487 < 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.909 > 0.698
Total TP 339 < 347
Total TN 61165 > 61041
Total FP 46 < 162
Total FP CONTRA 0 < 16
Total FP INCONS 34 < 134
Total FP COMP 12 = 12
Total FN 357 > 349
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 339
Total TN 61165
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 0
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 357
Total Scores
MCC 0.663
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.656 ± 0.101
Sensitivity 0.487
Positive Predictive Value 0.909
Nr of predictions 35

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y9C_V - 0.20 0.04 1.00 1 2277 0 0 0 0 23
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 347
Total TN 61041
Total FP 162
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 134
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 349
Total Scores
MCC 0.586
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.499
Positive Predictive Value 0.698
Nr of predictions 35

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_h - 0.48 0.37 0.62 16 6079 10 0 10 0 27
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NMU_E - 0.20 0.17 0.25 1 557 6 1 2 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.