CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MCFold
MCC 0.674 > 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.706 ± 0.094 > 0.597 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.530 < 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.863 > 0.552
Total TP 397 < 444
Total TN 72277 > 71932
Total FP 84 < 438
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 46
Total FP INCONS 57 < 315
Total FP COMP 21 < 77
Total FN 352 > 305
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MCFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 397
Total TN 72277
Total FP 84
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 352
Total Scores
MCC 0.674
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.706 ± 0.094
Sensitivity 0.530
Positive Predictive Value 0.863
Nr of predictions 41

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 457 0 0 0 0 7
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6101 4 0 4 0 39
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2YIE_Z - 0.82 0.67 1.00 8 1532 0 0 0 0 4
2YIE_X - 0.76 0.58 1.00 7 1371 0 0 0 0 5
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J0L_2 - 0.49 0.24 1.00 8 6208 0 0 0 0 25
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1125 3 0 3 0 16
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 465 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_h - 0.76 0.63 0.93 27 6076 4 0 2 2 16
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_7 - 0.60 0.41 0.88 7 1217 1 0 1 0 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 2
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.43 0.80 16 3140 4 0 4 0 21
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 444
Total TN 71932
Total FP 438
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 315
Total FP COMP 77
Total FN 305
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.116
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.552
Nr of predictions 41

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 19
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LHP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 650 1 0 0 1 0
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LQZ_A - 0.91 0.91 0.91 10 340 1 1 0 0 1
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 2 0 0 2 0
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 182 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 2 553 12 0 6 6 4
3R9X_C - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 585 7 0 3 4 3
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.