CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.634 > 0.226
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.173 > 0.184 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.501 > 0.106
Positive Predictive Value 0.808 > 0.494
Total TP 189 > 40
Total TN 43664 < 43817
Total FP 54 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 2
Total FP INCONS 40 > 39
Total FP COMP 9 > 1
Total FN 188 < 337
P-value 1.43692248862e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 189
Total TN 43664
Total FP 54
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 188
Total Scores
MCC 0.634
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.173
Sensitivity 0.501
Positive Predictive Value 0.808
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 0 11 0 20
3AMU_B 0.82 0.70 0.95 19 2983 3 0 1 2 8
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.64 0.45 0.90 19 3895 2 0 2 0 23
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.18 5 11753 29 5 18 6 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 7104 6 0 6 0 24
4AOB_A 0.71 0.50 1.00 21 4350 1 0 0 1 21
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1315 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 40
Total TN 43817
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 337
Total Scores
MCC 0.226
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.184 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.106
Positive Predictive Value 0.494
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 10 975 5 0 5 0 10
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
3UZL_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3564 6 0 6 0 37
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.