Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
CentroidHomfold‑LAST |
|
TurboFold(seed) |
| MCC |
0.593 |
>
|
0.550 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.593
±
0.235
|
>
|
0.555
±
0.229
|
| Sensitivity |
0.470 |
>
|
0.456 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.756 |
>
|
0.672 |
| Total TP |
133 |
>
|
129 |
| Total TN |
34374 |
>
|
34358 |
| Total FP |
50 |
<
|
73 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
<
|
8 |
| Total FP INCONS |
38 |
<
|
55 |
| Total FP COMP |
7 |
<
|
10 |
| Total FN |
150 |
<
|
154 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
133 |
| Total TN |
34374 |
| Total FP |
50 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
| Total FP INCONS |
38 |
| Total FP COMP |
7 |
| Total FN |
150 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.593 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.593
±
0.235
|
| Sensitivity |
0.470 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.756 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
129 |
| Total TN |
34358 |
| Total FP |
73 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
8 |
| Total FP INCONS |
55 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
154 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.550 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.555
±
0.229
|
| Sensitivity |
0.456 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.672 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|