CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		UNAFold
MCC	0.668	>	0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.091	>	0.671 ± 0.093
Sensitivity	0.515	<	0.547
Positive Predictive Value	0.873	>	0.701
Total TP	439	<	466
Total TN	82453	>	82291
Total FP	86	<	229
Total FP CONTRA	6	<	28
Total FP INCONS	58	<	171
Total FP COMP	22	<	30
Total FN	413	>	386
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	439
Total TN	82453
Total FP	86
Total FP CONTRA	6
Total FP INCONS	58
Total FP COMP	22
Total FN	413

Total Scores
MCC	0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.695 ± 0.091
Sensitivity	0.515
Positive Predictive Value	0.873
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	0	11	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	8	457	0	0	0	0	7
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	6101	4	0	4	0	39
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.20	0.04	1.00	1	2277	0	0	0	0	23
2YIE_X	-	0.76	0.58	1.00	7	1371	0	0	0	0	5
2YIE_Z	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	8	1532	0	0	0	0	4
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_h	-	0.76	0.63	0.93	27	6076	4	0	2	2	16
3J0L_7	-	0.60	0.41	0.88	7	1217	1	0	1	0	10
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	465	0	0	0	0	4
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1125	3	0	3	0	16
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.24	1.00	8	6208	0	0	0	0	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3NMU_E	-	0.41	0.17	1.00	1	560	3	0	0	3	5
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.53	1.00	18	2193	0	0	0	0	16
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.45	0.90	19	3895	2	0	2	0	23
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.43	0.80	16	3140	4	0	4	0	21
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.18	5	11753	29	5	18	6	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	7104	6	0	6	0	24
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	21	4350	1	0	0	1	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8

^top

Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	466
Total TN	82291
Total FP	229
Total FP CONTRA	28
Total FP INCONS	171
Total FP COMP	30
Total FN	386

Total Scores
MCC	0.616
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.671 ± 0.093
Sensitivity	0.547
Positive Predictive Value	0.701
Nr of predictions	44

^top

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LA5_A	-	0.39	0.26	0.63	5	622	3	1	2	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	2	13	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.81	0.67	1.00	10	455	0	0	0	0	5
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.93	0.87	1.00	34	6071	1	0	0	1	5
2LQZ_A	-	0.85	0.82	0.90	9	341	1	1	0	0	2
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.62	0.58	0.67	14	2257	8	1	6	1	10
2YIE_X	-	0.36	0.33	0.40	4	1368	6	2	4	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1525	15	3	12	0	12
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.84	16	2984	5	0	3	2	11
3J0L_1	-	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1212	2	0	2	0	8
3J0L_h	-	0.75	0.60	0.93	26	6077	4	0	2	2	17
3J0L_7	-	0.48	0.41	0.58	7	1213	5	0	5	0	10
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_a	-	0.51	0.50	0.53	8	1113	7	3	4	0	8
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J0L_2	-	0.25	0.24	0.26	8	6185	25	2	21	2	25
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.23	0.30	7	2752	16	1	15	0	23
3NMU_E	-	0.54	0.50	0.60	3	556	5	0	2	3	3
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.52	0.79	22	3888	6	1	5	0	20
3SIU_F	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	8	370	0	0	0	0	3
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.48	0.38	0.61	14	3547	9	0	9	0	23
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.14	0.15	0.14	5	11745	42	5	26	11	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.59	0.82	32	7101	7	1	6	0	22
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.50	0.40	0.63	17	4344	11	2	8	1	25
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.70	0.58	0.85	11	1262	2	1	1	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.32	0.26	0.42	5	1314	7	1	6	0	14

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]