CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

Methods

Datasets

Rankings

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Contact us

RSS feeds

Twitter

Overview

Metric	CentroidHomfold‑LAST		Vsfold5
MCC	0.665	>	0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.691 ± 0.092	>	0.580 ± 0.113
Sensitivity	0.511	>	0.424
Positive Predictive Value	0.872	>	0.568
Total TP	430	>	357
Total TN	82112	>	81977
Total FP	85	<	298
Total FP CONTRA	5	<	24
Total FP INCONS	58	<	247
Total FP COMP	22	<	27
Total FN	411	<	484
P-value	3.56938820447e-08

^top

Performance plots

^top

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	430
Total TN	82112
Total FP	85
Total FP CONTRA	5
Total FP INCONS	58
Total FP COMP	22
Total FN	411

Total Scores
MCC	0.665
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.691 ± 0.092
Sensitivity	0.511
Positive Predictive Value	0.872
Nr of predictions	43

^top

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.90	0.95	18	971	1	0	1	0	2
2LA5_A	-	0.46	0.26	0.83	5	624	1	0	1	0	14
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	0	11	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.90	0.82	1.00	9	342	1	0	0	1	2
2LDT_A	-	0.72	0.53	1.00	8	457	0	0	0	0	7
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.95	0.90	1.00	9	267	0	0	0	0	1
2LKR_A	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	6101	4	0	4	0	39
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.20	0.04	1.00	1	2277	0	0	0	0	23
2YIE_X	-	0.76	0.58	1.00	7	1371	0	0	0	0	5
2YIE_Z	-	0.82	0.67	1.00	8	1532	0	0	0	0	4
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.70	0.95	19	2983	3	0	1	2	8
3J0L_a	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1125	3	0	3	0	16
3J0L_1	-	0.65	0.47	0.90	9	1215	2	0	1	1	10
3J0L_h	-	0.76	0.63	0.93	27	6076	4	0	2	2	16
3J0L_7	-	0.60	0.41	0.88	7	1217	1	0	1	0	10
3J0L_g	-	0.00	0.00	0.00	0	465	0	0	0	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.49	0.24	1.00	8	6208	0	0	0	0	25
3J0L_8	-	0.93	0.88	1.00	7	183	0	0	0	0	1
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.57	1.00	17	2758	0	0	0	0	13
3NMU_E	-	0.41	0.17	1.00	1	560	3	0	0	3	5
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.53	1.00	18	2193	0	0	0	0	16
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.64	0.45	0.90	19	3895	2	0	2	0	23
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	10	396	0	0	0	0	2
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.58	0.43	0.80	16	3140	4	0	4	0	21
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	20	3549	1	0	1	0	17
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.15	0.18	5	11753	29	5	18	6	28
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.68	0.56	0.83	30	7104	6	0	6	0	24
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.71	0.50	1.00	21	4350	1	0	0	1	21
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1264	0	0	0	0	8
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.58	1.00	11	1315	0	0	0	0	8

^top

Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	357
Total TN	81977
Total FP	298
Total FP CONTRA	24
Total FP INCONS	247
Total FP COMP	27
Total FN	484

Total Scores
MCC	0.487
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.580 ± 0.113
Sensitivity	0.424
Positive Predictive Value	0.568
Nr of predictions	43

^top

2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.95	0.90	1.00	18	972	0	0	0	0	2
2LA5_A	-	-0.02	0.00	0.00	0	623	7	0	7	0	19
2LBS_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	14	482	0	0	0	0	0
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1527	13	0	13	0	20
2LDL_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	8	343	1	0	0	1	3
2LDT_A	-	0.85	0.73	1.00	11	454	0	0	0	0	4
2LHP_A	-	0.97	0.94	1.00	15	651	0	0	0	0	1
2LJJ_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	8	343	2	0	0	2	0
2LK3_A	-	0.89	0.80	1.00	8	268	0	0	0	0	2
2LKR_A	-	0.27	0.23	0.32	9	6077	19	2	17	0	30
2LWK_A	-	0.83	0.77	0.91	10	485	1	0	1	0	3
2RRC_A	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	5	226	0	0	0	0	5
2Y8W_B	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	184	1	0	0	1	0
2Y9C_V	-	0.61	0.54	0.68	13	2259	7	1	5	1	11
2YIE_X	-	0.30	0.33	0.29	4	1364	10	2	8	0	8
2YIE_Z	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1529	11	3	8	0	12
3AMU_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.67	0.59	0.76	16	2982	7	0	5	2	11
3J0L_a	-	0.39	0.31	0.50	5	1118	5	2	3	0	11
3J0L_1	-	0.27	0.21	0.36	4	1214	7	1	6	0	15
3J0L_h	-	0.18	0.14	0.24	6	6080	19	1	18	0	37
3J0L_7	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1212	13	0	13	0	17
3J0L_g	-	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	461	4	1	3	0	4
3J0L_2	-	0.35	0.33	0.37	11	6186	21	3	16	2	22
3J0L_8	-	0.70	0.50	1.00	4	186	0	0	0	0	4
3J16_L	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.67	1.00	20	2755	0	0	0	0	10
3NMU_E	-	0.20	0.17	0.25	1	557	5	0	3	2	5
3R9X_C	-	0.84	0.80	0.89	8	586	2	0	1	1	2
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.75	0.65	0.88	22	2186	3	0	3	0	12
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.11	0.10	0.15	4	3890	22	0	22	0	38
3SIU_F	-	0.73	0.55	1.00	6	372	0	0	0	0	5
3SN2_B	IRE_II links to Rfam database...	0.96	0.92	1.00	11	395	0	0	0	0	1
3TRZ_Z	-	0.91	0.83	1.00	5	205	1	0	0	1	1
3TS0_U	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	6	247	1	0	0	1	0
3TS2_V	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	5	271	0	0	0	0	0
3U4M_B	-	0.38	0.32	0.46	12	3134	14	0	14	0	25
3UZL_B	tRNA links to Rfam database...	0.16	0.14	0.20	5	3545	20	1	19	0	32
3VJR_D	-	0.96	0.92	1.00	12	618	0	0	0	0	1
4A1C_2	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.24	0.24	0.24	8	11748	37	3	22	12	25
4A1C_3	5S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.26	0.22	0.32	12	7103	25	2	23	0	42
4A4U_A	-	1.00	1.00	1.00	9	222	0	0	0	0	0
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.18	0.14	0.25	6	4347	19	1	17	1	36
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4

^top

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance plots

Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]