CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Vsfold5 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Vsfold5
MCC 0.704 > 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.104 > 0.593 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.592 > 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.842 > 0.545
Total TP 352 > 243
Total TN 63821 > 63793
Total FP 89 < 223
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 18
Total FP INCONS 61 < 185
Total FP COMP 23 > 20
Total FN 243 < 352
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 352
Total TN 63821
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 23
Total FN 243
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.737 ± 0.104
Sensitivity 0.592
Positive Predictive Value 0.842
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 1524 6 0 6 0 10
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 344 2 0 0 2 1
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.65 0.56 0.76 22 6076 9 0 7 2 17
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
3J0L_2 - 0.64 0.61 0.69 20 6187 11 2 7 2 13
3J0L_1 - 0.70 0.58 0.85 11 1212 3 0 2 1 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.71 0.56 0.90 9 1118 1 0 1 0 7
3J0L_h - 0.82 0.67 1.00 29 6076 2 0 0 2 14
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 0 0 0 0 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 3139 0 0 0 0 16
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.20 0.15 0.28 5 11763 26 0 13 13 28
4A1C_3 0.78 0.63 0.97 34 7105 1 0 1 0 20
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.52 0.40 0.68 17 4346 9 1 7 1 25
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Vsfold5 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold5

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 243
Total TN 63793
Total FP 223
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 185
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 352
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.408
Positive Predictive Value 0.545
Nr of predictions 29

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold5 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 343 1 0 0 1 3
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2LKR_A - 0.27 0.23 0.32 9 6077 19 2 17 0 30
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.35 0.33 0.37 11 6186 21 3 16 2 22
3J0L_1 - 0.27 0.21 0.36 4 1214 7 1 6 0 15
3J0L_8 - 0.70 0.50 1.00 4 186 0 0 0 0 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.31 0.50 5 1118 5 2 3 0 11
3J0L_h - 0.18 0.14 0.24 6 6080 19 1 18 0 37
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.16 0.14 0.20 5 3545 20 1 19 0 32
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.24 0.24 0.24 8 11748 37 3 22 12 25
4A1C_3 0.26 0.22 0.32 12 7103 25 2 23 0 42
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.18 0.14 0.25 6 4347 19 1 17 1 36
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.