CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold MCFold
MCC 0.656 > 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.069 > 0.610 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.568 < 0.599
Positive Predictive Value 0.764 > 0.567
Total TP 751 < 793
Total TN 138045 > 137630
Total FP 268 < 706
Total FP CONTRA 32 < 59
Total FP INCONS 200 < 546
Total FP COMP 36 < 101
Total FN 572 > 530
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 751
Total TN 138045
Total FP 268
Total FP CONTRA 32
Total FP INCONS 200
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 572
Total Scores
MCC 0.656
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.069
Sensitivity 0.568
Positive Predictive Value 0.764
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 10 1475 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L2K_A - 0.82 0.68 1.00 13 848 0 0 0 0 6
2L3C_B - 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 7
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_h - 0.48 0.37 0.62 16 6079 10 0 10 0 27
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.58 0.48 0.71 29 9139 13 1 11 1 32
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.20 0.17 0.25 1 557 6 1 2 3 5
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 793
Total TN 137630
Total FP 706
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 546
Total FP COMP 101
Total FN 530
Total Scores
MCC 0.579
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.610 ± 0.090
Sensitivity 0.599
Positive Predictive Value 0.567
Nr of predictions 59

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 341 1 0 0 1 0
2KZL_A - 0.80 0.84 0.76 16 1464 9 1 4 4 3
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 842 1 0 0 1 0
2L3C_B - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 545 0 0 0 0 1
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 582 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 34 2451 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 314 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 19
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LI4_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 481 0 0 0 0 1
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.92 0.95 36 6067 14 0 2 12 3
2LWK_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 483 2 0 1 1 1
2RRC_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4530 37 2 23 12 15
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
2Y9C_V - 0.62 0.67 0.59 16 2251 13 2 9 2 8
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AM1_B - 0.93 0.89 0.97 31 3208 2 0 1 1 4
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J0L_h - 0.91 0.91 0.91 39 6062 13 0 4 9 4
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_2 - 0.21 0.24 0.18 8 6172 39 7 29 3 25
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3NDB_M - 0.23 0.23 0.24 14 9121 46 1 44 1 47
3NKB_B - 0.56 0.58 0.56 15 1989 13 0 12 1 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 2 553 12 0 6 6 4
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 729 5 0 0 5 0
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3R4F_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 23 2120 5 0 2 3 2
3R9X_C - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 585 7 0 3 4 3
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.59 0.59 22 3123 15 0 15 0 15
3VJR_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 617 1 0 0 1 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.