CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods

Laboratory of Structural Bioinformatics @ Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan

Home

RNA 2D Atlas

Help

FAQ

Table of contents:

Overview

Performance Plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

Total counts & total scores
Individual counts

Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...

Overview

Metric	Cylofold		Murlet(seed)
MCC	0.602	>	0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.649 ± 0.167	>	0.508 ± 0.123
Sensitivity	0.522	>	0.300
Positive Predictive Value	0.701	<	0.849
Total TP	216	>	124
Total TN	54540	<	54702
Total FP	113	>	25
Total FP CONTRA	15	>	1
Total FP INCONS	77	>	21
Total FP COMP	21	>	3
Total FN	198	<	290
P-value	1.70887622364e-08

Performance plots

Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	216
Total TN	54540
Total FP	113
Total FP CONTRA	15
Total FP INCONS	77
Total FP COMP	21
Total FN	198

Total Scores
MCC	0.602
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.649 ± 0.167
Sensitivity	0.522
Positive Predictive Value	0.701
Nr of predictions	13

2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.91	0.83	1.00	20	2060	0	0	0	0	4
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.92	0.84	1.00	21	2124	0	0	0	0	4
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.97	0.95	1.00	19	971	0	0	0	0	1
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	0.61	0.55	0.69	11	1524	5	0	5	0	9
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.40	0.36	8	4538	23	7	7	9	12
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.10	0.10	0.11	4	5115	32	1	31	0	38
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.36	0.34	0.38	12	12371	29	5	15	9	23
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.72	0.54	0.95	39	12839	4	0	2	2	33
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.76	0.59	1.00	20	2191	0	0	0	0	14
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.62	0.50	0.78	21	3889	6	0	6	0	21
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.35	0.26	0.48	11	4348	13	1	11	1	31
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.89	0.79	1.00	15	1260	0	0	0	0	4
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.86	0.79	0.94	15	1310	1	1	0	0	4

Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP	124
Total TN	54702
Total FP	25
Total FP CONTRA	1
Total FP INCONS	21
Total FP COMP	3
Total FN	290

Total Scores
MCC	0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals	0.508 ± 0.123
Sensitivity	0.300
Positive Predictive Value	0.849
Nr of predictions	13

2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain	Rfam family	MCC	SENS	PPV	TP	TN	FP	FP CONTRA	FP INCONS	FP COMP	FN
2L1F_A	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.82	0.75	0.90	18	2060	2	0	2	0	6
2L1F_B	Gammaretro_CES links to Rfam database...	0.80	0.72	0.90	18	2125	2	0	2	0	7
2L94_A	HIV_FE links to Rfam database...	0.59	0.40	0.89	8	981	1	0	1	0	12
2LC8_A	GP_knot1 links to Rfam database...	-0.01	0.00	0.00	0	1528	12	0	12	0	20
2XKV_B	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.20	1.00	4	4556	2	0	0	2	16
2XXA_G	Bacteria_small_SRP links to Rfam database...	0.38	0.14	1.00	6	5145	0	0	0	0	36
3O58_3	5_8S_rRNA links to Rfam database...	0.45	0.20	1.00	7	12396	0	0	0	0	28
3PDR_A	ykoK links to Rfam database...	0.44	0.19	1.00	14	12866	0	0	0	0	58
3RKF_A	Purine links to Rfam database...	0.53	0.35	0.80	12	2196	3	1	2	0	22
3SD1_A	THF links to Rfam database...	0.47	0.26	0.85	11	3903	2	0	2	0	31
4AOB_A	SAM links to Rfam database...	0.58	0.33	1.00	14	4357	1	0	0	1	28
4ENB_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.32	1.00	6	1269	0	0	0	0	13
4ENC_A	crcB links to Rfam database...	0.56	0.32	1.00	6	1320	0	0	0	0	13

Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.